Signed examination report or AUP report with factual findings
Prove your on-chain income is real.
Independent verification that income from staking, protocol fees, yield farming, trading, or token sales is accurately reported. Examination (AT-C 205) provides an opinion. Agreed-upon procedures (AT-C 215) provide factual findings on specific procedures you define.
Signed examination report or AUP report with factual findings
On-chain income requires on-chain verification. Staking rewards, protocol fees, LP rewards are not bank deposits. Verifying them requires reading the blockchain.
Scoping. Identify income streams, reporting period, recognition criteria. For AUPs, document specific procedures in an engagement letter.
DeFi protocols. Governance body or institutional counterparties need independent verification of on-chain income.
| What is the difference between an examination and AUP? | An examination provides an opinion on whether the income assertion is fairly stated. AUP provides factual findings on specific procedures without expressing an opinion. Examinations are for external use. AUPs are for targeted verification. |
| What types of on-chain income can you verify? | Staking rewards, protocol fees, yield farming and DeFi income, trading gains and losses, and token sale revenue. We trace at the transaction level across protocols. |
| Can this be done on a recurring basis? | Yes. Quarterly retainers are the most common engagement model. Recurring clients get faster turnaround. |
| How does this relate to a financial review or audit? | Income attestation provides independent supporting evidence. It pairs with asset attestation for a complete financial picture, and together they feed into a full financial statement review or audit. |
Flat fee. No hourly billing. Delivered in 2-10 business days by a US-licensed CPA.
PLEASE VIEW ON DESKTOP